Effective Removal of Acid Blue 113 and Acid Orange 10 from Industrial Wastewater Using a Magnetic Composite Prepared from the Hard Shell of the Native Bane Fruit

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, PO Box 6616935391, Sanandaj, Iran,

Abstract

This study used thermochemical and Fe particle co-precipitation methods to prepare a magnetic-activated carbon composite. The hard nutshell of Baneh from the Oraman region of Kurdistan province was used as raw material. The structural properties of the prepared adsorbent were investigated using SEM, FT-IR, EDAX, BET, and VSM analysis methods. The SEM images clearly showed the formation of a porous adsorbent with porosity in the range of micro- and mesopores. The results of the FT-IR and EDAX analyses proved the presence of Fe in the absorbent structure. The specific surface area of the adsorbent before and after the deposition of iron particles was determined to be 229.6 and 179.37 m2/g, respectively. Under the optimized conditions, the removal amount of the investigated dyes from the model solutions was 91.2 and 98.6 % for acid blue 113 and acid orange 10, respectively. The kinetic study revealed that the pseudo-second-order model best fits the obtained adsorption data. In addition, the Freundlich model was the best model to describe the adsorption process.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Srivastava AK, Kumar D, Singh D, Singh RK. Xenobiotics in Chemical Carcinogenesis. 1th ed. Mysore: Elsevier; 2022. 
  2. Chandanshive V, Kadam S, Rane N, Jeon BH, Jadhav J, Govindwar S. In situ textile wastewater treatment in high rate transpiration system furrows planted with aquatic macrophytes and floating phytobeds. Chemosphere. 2020;252: 126513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere. 2020.126513.
  3. Bhatia D, Sharma NR, Singh J, Kanwar RS. Biological Methods for Textile Dye Removal from Wastewater: A Review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017; 47: 1836–1876. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1393263.
  4. Al-Tohamy R, Ali SS, Li F, Okasha KM, Mahmoud YAG, et al. 
  5. Rania A. T, Sameh S. A, Fanghua L, Kamal M. O, Yehia A. G. M, Tamer E, et al. A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: Ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotoxic. Environ. Saf.  2022; 231:113160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160
  6. Garg A, Chopra L. Dye Waste: A significant environmental hazard. Mater. Today: Proc. 2022; 48(5):1310-1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.003.
  7. Gürses A, Açıkyıldız M, Güneş K, Gürses MS. 2d ed. Springer; 2016. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-33892-7.
  8. Rathi BS, Kumar PS. Sustainable approach on the biodegradation of azo dyes: A short review. Curr. Opin. Green Sustainable Chem. 2022; 33:100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cogsc. 2021.100578.
  9. Sunkar S, Prakash P, Dhandapani B, Baigenzhenov O, Kumar JA, Nachiyaar V. Adsorptive removal of acid blue dye 113 using three agricultural waste biomasses: The possibility of valorization by activation and carbonization – A comparative analysis. Environ. Res. 2023;233(15):116486.  https://doi.org/ 10. 1016/j.envres.2023.116486.
  10. Negash A, Tibebe D, Mulugeta M, Kassa Y. A study of basic and reactive dyes removal from synthetic and industrial wastewater by electrocoagulation process, S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2023;46:122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce. 2023.07.015.
  11. Tsai CY, Liu CW, Chan YH., Chang TY, Chen BC, Hsi HC. Development of HCl-treated titania nanotube photocatalysts for dye photodegradation and low-concentration elemental mercury removal, Catal. Today. 2017;297(15):113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.04.061.
  12. Cui T, Wang X, Chen Y, Chen Y, Fu B, Tu,Y. Reverse Osmosis coupling Multi-Catalytic Ozonation (RO-MCO) in treating printing and dyeing wastewater and membrane concentrate: Removal performance and mechanism. Water Resour. Ind. 2023; 30:100217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri. 2023.100217.
  13. Kamali M, Qotbi A, Haghani M, Vatanpour V. Novel sulfur-containing 2,6-diamino pyridine-based polymer as an additive in polyethersulfone: An effective membrane for removal of mercury (II) ion and dye pollutants. React. Funct. Polym. 2023; 193:105758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym. 2023. 105758. 
  14. Mais L, Vacca A, Mascia M, Usai EM, Tronci S, Palmas S. Experimental study on the optimisation of azo-dyes removal by photo-electrochemical oxidation with TiO2 nanotubes.  Chemosphere. 2020; 248:125938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chemosphere.2020.125938.
  15. Tien C, Introduction to Adsorption Basics, Analysis, and Applications. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier;2019. 
  16. Marsh H, Reinoso FR, Activated Carbon. 1st ed. Elsevier;2006.
  17. Thomaz KTC, Queiroz LS, Faial KDCF, Zamian JR, do Nascimento LAS, Rocha Filho GN, Removal of Fe and Mn ions from groundwater using activated carbon obtained from waste products of Brazil nut and andiroba cultivation in the Amazon region. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2023;38: e00737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00737.
  18. Pinheiro RF, Grimm A, Boit Martinello K, Khan MR., Ahmad, N, Silva LFO, Vine pruning waste-based activated carbon for cerium and lanthanum adsorption from water and real leachate. J. Rare Earths. 2023, In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2023.10.020.
  19. Pullas Navarrete J, Torre, E. Preparation of activated carbon fibers (ACF) impregnated with metallic silver particles from cotton-woven wastes and its performance as an antibacterial agent. Mater. Today Commun. 2022; 33:104598. https://doi. org/ 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104598.
  20. Bazan-Wozniak A, Pietrzak R. Adsorption of organic and inorganic pollutants on activated bio-carbons prepared by chemical activation of residues of supercritical extraction of raw plants. J. Chem. Eng. 2020; 393:124785. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124785.
  21. Sutthasupa S, Koo-amornpattana W, Worasuwannarak N, Prachakittikul P, Teachawachirasiri P, Wanthong W, Sugarcane bagasse-derived granular activated carbon hybridized with ash in bio-based alginate/gelatin polymer matrix for methylene blue adsorption. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023; 253(7):127464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac. 2023.127464.
  22. Shirzad-Siboni M, Jafari SJ, Giahi O, Kim I, Lee S-M, Yang J-K. Removal of acid blue 113 and reactive black 5 dye from aqueous solutions by activated red mud. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014; 20:1432–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.07.028.
  23. Li R., Chen J, Zhang H, Rehman F, Siddique J, Shahab A, et al. Facile synthesis of magnetic-activated nanocomposites for effective removal of cationic and anionic dyes in an aqueous environment: An equilibrium isotherm, kinetics and thermodynamic studies. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023; 189:319-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.11.017.
  24. Kittappa S, Jais FM, Ramalingam M, Mohd NS, Ibrahim S. Functionalized magnetic mesoporous palm shell activated carbon for enhanced removal of azo dyes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020;8(5):104081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020. 104081.
  25. Kaewtrakulchai N, Chanpee S, Pasee W, Putta A, Chutipaijit S, Kaewpanha M, et al. Valorization of horse manure conversion to magnetic carbon nanofiber for dye adsorption by hydrothermal treatment coupled with carbonization. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering 2024; 9:100563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100563.
  26. Ren Z, Yang X, Zhang W, Zhao Z. Preparation, characterization and performance of a novel magnetic Fe-Zn activated carbon for efficient removal of dyes from wastewater. J. Mol. Struc. 2023; 1274:134407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.134407.
  27. Yang Z, Zhao Z, Yang X, Ren Z. Xanthate modified magnetic activated carbon for efficient removal of cationic dyes and tetracycline hydrochloride from aqueous solutions. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021; 615:126273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126273.
  28. Barasarathi J, Abdullah PS, Uche EC. Application of magnetic carbon nanocomposite from agro-waste for the removal of pollutants from water and wastewater. Chemosphere 2022; 305:135384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chemosphere.2022.135384.
  29. Anyika C, Asri NAM, Majid ZA, Yahya A, Jaafar J. Synthesis and characterization of magnetic activated carbon developed from palm kernel shells. Nanotech. Environ Eng. 2017;2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-017-0027-6
  30. Murphy OP, Vashishtha M, Palanisamy P, Kumar KV. A Review on the adsorption isotherms and design calculations for the optimization of adsorbent mass and contact time. ACS Omega 2023; 8:17407–30. https://doi.org/10. 1021/acsomega. 2c08155.
  31. Khalil A, Salem M, Ragab S, Sillanpää M, El Nemr A. Orange peels magnetic activate carbon (MG-OPAC) composite formation for toxic chromium absorption from wastewater. Sci Rep 2023; 13:3402. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-023-30161-6.
  32. Wang J, Ma J, Sun Y. Adsorption of methylene blue by coal-based activated carbon in high-salt wastewater. Water 2022; 14:3576. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213576.
  33. Shirzad F, Ebrahimi B, Roostaie A, Mohammadiazar S. Acid modified activated carbon derived from chestnut oak shells for adsorption and removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution. Prog. Color. Colorants Coat. 2023;16. https://doi.org/ 10.30509/pccc.2022.166980.1170.
  34. Geçgel Ü, Özcan G, Gürpınar GÇ. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by activated carbon prepared from pea shells (Pisum sativum). J. Chem. 2013; 2013:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/614083.
  35. Malarvizhi R, Ho Y-S. The influence of pH and the structure of the dye molecules on adsorption isotherm modeling using activated carbon. Desalination 2010; 264:97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.010.
  36. Kurd Mostafapour F, Zolghadr R, Khodadadi Saloot M, Mahvi AH, Balarak D, Safari E. Removal of Acid blue 113 from aqueous medium using a novel magnetic adsorbent derived from activated carbon fiber. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022; In press, https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319. 2022.2130061.
  37. Jain SN, Gogate PR. Acid Blue 113 removal from aqueous solution using novel biosorbent based on NaOH treated and surfactant modified fallen leaves of Prunus Dulcis. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017;5(4):3384-3394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jece. 2017.06.047.
  38. Sodhani H, Hedaoo S, Murugesan G, Pai S, Vinayagam R, Varadavenkatesan T, et al. Adsorptive removal of Acid Blue 113 using hydroxyapatite nanoadsorbents synthesized using Peltophorum pterocarpum pod extract. Chemosphere. 2022; 299:134752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere. 2022. 134752.
  39. Pourali P, Behzad M, Arfaeinia H, Ahmadfazeli A, Afshin S, Poureshgh Y, et al. Removal of acid blue 113 from aqueous solutions using low-cost adsorbent: adsorption isotherms, thermodynamics, kinetics and regeneration studies. Sep. Sci. Technol. 202;56(18):3079-3091. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01496395.2020.1867583.
  40. Pan Z, Zhang X, Wang X. Adsorption of acid orange 10 on cross-linked porous polyimide. SN Appl. Sci. 2019; 239:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0243-8.
  41. Rahimi B, Rezaie-Rahimi N, Jafari N, Abdolahnejad A, Ebrahimi A. Experimental data on the removal of acid orange 10 dye from aqueous solutions using TiO2/Na-Y zeolite and BiVO4/Na-Y zeolite nanostructures: A comparison study.  Data in Brief. 2021; 35: 106869. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j. dib.2021.106869.
  42. Budiman H, Zuas O. Adsorption isotherm studies on acid orange-10 dye removal using cerium dioxide nanoparticles. Indones. J. Chem. 201;14(3):226-232. https://doi.org/10. 22146/ijc.21232.
  43. Banerjee S, Gautam RK, Jaiswal A, Gautam PK, Chattopadhyaya MC. Study on adsorption behavior of Acid Orange 10 onto modified wheat husk. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016;57(26):12302-12315. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994. 2015.1046151.
Journal of Color Science and Technology
Volume 17, Issue 4 - Serial Number 66
January 2024
Pages 325-340

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics